- Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman was accompanied out of the White Home on Friday, nearly 3 months after he testified against President Donald Trump in the impeachment query.
- Vindman was a key witness who voiced his concerns about Trump’s contact with Ukraine while also resolving his fret about speaking out versus the president.
- In remarks to reporters at the time, Defense Secretary Mark Esper vowed that Vindman was secured by guidelines indicated to protect whistleblowers from retaliation.
- Trump also fired Gordon Sondland, the United States’s ambassador to the EU, in what seemed a sweeping act of personal revenge once the impeachment procedure wrapped up in the Senate.
- Go to Service Insider’s homepage for more stories
President Donald Trump’s abrupt firing of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman appears to cross assurances that Defense Secretary Mark Esper formerly voiced, that swore protections for whistleblowers.
In a Friday night sector, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow indicated a November 2019 tweet from Marcus Weisgerber, an editor at military and defense outlet Defense One, which contained a records of an exchange with Esper, where the secretary said there was “no retaliation” enabled under the law versus whistleblowers.
” All I’m stating is that if you come forward with information that you feel is, that you feel you are a whistleblower, then you are secured,” Esper stated, according to the records.
— Marcus Weisgerber (@MarcusReports) November 11, 2019
Maddow stated Friday night that the comments should have to be “re-upped in the public record,” hours after Vindman, the leading Ukraine professional on the National Security Council, and his twin bro were fired from their posts in the White House
Vindman openly voiced his issues over retaliation
Vindman came into Trump’s crosshairs last fall, when he affirmed in the House impeachment questions on November 19 about his firsthand knowledge of Trump’s contact with Ukrainian authorities and his concerns over a July 25 call in between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, where Trump pressed Zelensky to examine his political rival, previous President Joe Biden and his child.
During the opening statement in his statement, Vindman compared the treatment of whistleblowers in America to how they may be treated in Russia prior to addressing his father, who came to America from the Soviet Union, and reiterating his dedication to “telling the reality.”
” Dad, my sitting here today, in the United States Capitol talking to our chosen authorities is proof that you made the best choice forty years ago to leave the Soviet Union and come here to United States of America searching for a much better life for our family,” Vindman stated. “Do not fret, I will be fine for informing the reality.”
Vindman’s lawyer said in a scathing statement launched Friday that Vindman was fired for “telling the reality,” which stood in direct contrast to reports around the February 7 firing claiming the move was a “broader effort to shrink” the Trump administration’s foreign-policy bureaucracy. Comments from Trump and his closest allies rapidly damage that already-shaky defense.
Trump informed reporters hours prior to Vindman’s departure that he was “not delighted” with the official, who affirmed in compliance with a lawful congressional subpoena. Trump’s remark came days after White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham stated the president thinks ” individuals need to pay for” the method Trump was dealt with
Trump’s oldest child, Donald Trump Jr., provided perhaps the most damning talk about the background of the decision, tweeting, “Enable me a minute to thank– and this might be a little bit of a surprise– Adam Schiff,” describing your home Intelligence Committee chairman who handled witness testimony in the impeachment hearings.
” Were it not for his crack investigation skills, @realDonaldTrump may have had a harder time unearthing who all needed to be fired. Thanks, Adam! #FullOfSchiff,” Trump Jr. composed.